MUST READ: KOSOVO SECESSIONS: 06, 07, 08

KOSOVO SECESSIONS: 06, 07, 08
Part 1: 2006 and 2007 Secessions
By Vojin Joksimovich

Pierre Marti, a Belgian economist, convinced me that the term independence used by the Western governments and the mainstream media should be dropped in favor of secession. He wrote: “Independence is not something that can be merely proclaimed; it is something that can and must only be achieved...The Albanian minority of Serbia may proclaim the secession of Kosovo and Metohija; however, it will not achieve independence at any time in foreseeable future. First, the Albanian minority of Serbia is not a sovereign people: It is an irredentist diaspora of the Republic of Albania, honoring that country’s flag, national day, and a political vision of a greater Albania. Second, it is only because the Albanian minority of Serbia is living in a part of Serbia under foreign occupation that it can dream of separating the occupied province from the country of which it is a part. Third, even if the occupying forces withdraw as soon as secession is proclaimed by these immigrants and recognized by the occupying countries, this territory is simply not viable on its own and will remain dependent on a capital other than Belgrade for its economy, energy, food, defense and education (at the very least) whether this capital will be Tirana, Ankara, Brussels or Washington.” Serbian Prime Minister (PM) Vojislav Kostunica correctly stated that Kosovo would be a “puppet” of the U.S. and NATO.

The aspirations of Albanian separatisms, illustrated well through three Leagues of Prizren, date back to 1878 during the Berlin Congress. In order to accomplish their separatist goal the Albanians have developed the “imperialism of the small” approach, i.e. reliance on a superpower being the Ottoman Empire, the Austro-Hungarian Empire, Mussolini’s Italy, Tito’s Communism and now the U.S.-led NATO These historical aspects are discussed in my book Kosovo Crisis: A Study in Foreign Policy Mismanagement. This three part essay focuses primarily on the last two and half years. Part I provides a summary of salient events leading to 2006 and 2007 attempts by the U.S.-led NATO countries to create a second Albania in Europe on 15% of the territory of democratic Serbia and its cradle of national history. Part II provides insights and an analysis following failure of negotiations mediated by the troika: U.S./EU/Russia leading into early 2008 viewed as the decision-making season. Part III attempts to answer a burning question regarding the enigma behind the U.S. policies in the Balkans.

...



Pertinent Links:

1) KOSOVO SECESSIONS: 06, 07, 08

MUST READ: KOSOVO SECESSIONS: 06, 07, 08

KOSOVO SECESSIONS: 06, 07, 08
Part 2: 2008 Secessions
By Vojin Joksimovich


Conclusion

It is difficult to believe that in the 21st century the world’s only superpower for the reasons to be discussed in Part III, with support from big EU four wants to carve up a sovereign country against its will. Serbia has demonstrated that it wants to join the European family of nations and has been developing a democratic future. There are many Kosovo’s round the globe for which the U.S. and its NATO allies insist preservation of territorial integrity must be maintained. Nonetheless, they insist that creation of a second Albania in Europe on Serbian territory must take place. Their bulldozers are in high gear and unless smaller EU countries seriously challenge this abuse of power a precedent with far reaching consequences will be created. Russia and Serbia can still turn these bulldozers around depending on the moves they choose to make in early 2008. D day was supposed to be in 2006, then in 2007 and then on December 10. Kosovo PM Ceku, after hearing from Rice that she couldn’t imagine Kosovo remaining part of Serbia, wanted to move it even to late November in order to overlap with the Albanian Flag Day. It has now been moved now to February/March and some are even talking about May. For a huge mess that has been unnecessarily created it’s going to take a while for a cleanup to take place. Upon a serious scrutiny, the unprecedented autonomy Serbia has offered might look attractive. In 2008 there might be a secession followed by recognition of some Western and Islamic countries but there might not be. Stalemate might continue yet for a while. The outcome of secession is still uncertain. However, what is certain is that a truly independent state will not be created.




Pertinent Links:

1) Part 2: 2008 Secessions